Analysis · LIHTC

Compare Jurisdictions

Side-by-side comparison of 2–6 Colorado jurisdictions across every LIHTC opportunity scoring dimension. Pick a target deal type (9% competitive, 4% bond, Preservation, Workforce/Resort, Prop 123/Local, or Balanced) to re-rank the comparison for that round's priorities.

How to read this comparison
  • What's compared: Six dimensions per jurisdiction — population, recent CHFA award count, AMI gap, basis-boost coverage (QCT + DDA), civic capacity, and market-capture advantage (LIHTC vs FMR).
  • What "best" means: The green-highlighted cell in each row is the strongest value in that dimension across all places shown. "Best" is row-by-row, not a single composite ranking.
  • Data vintages mix: Population is current ACS 1-yr; AMI gap is HUD CHAS (3+ years old); CHFA awards are live. Different rows = different freshness; the column footnote names each.
  • What this comparison does NOT tell you: Local political climate, fee waivers, site control, environmental constraints, or community-opposition signals.